Santa Clara University
Religious Studies Department, SCU
Class Prep
Course Links
Syllabus
Class Prep
Camino
Assignments
Style Sheet
Bible
Library Reserve
Bibliography
Glossary
Extra Credit
Grades
Research Link
"Ain't Misbehavin'": The Greeks Defend their Gods
 
Aphrodite, Pan and Eros, the 'Slipper-Slapper,' ca. 100 BCE The beauty of Homer's epic poetry gave the Iliad/Odyssey classic status in Greek culture.  Homer was standard fare in the curriculum of Greek students and of non-Greek students who aspired to the best education.
 
But there was a problem with Homer's classic: the god(s) misbehaved, or behaved in a manner that later generations found inconceivable.  We saw this when we read Aeschylus' Oresteia: gods fighting amongst themselves, taking sides with humans, and--if we looked at Homer--shape-shifting into human and animal bodies so as to torment or seduce.
 
Plato was perhaps one of the first to criticize the Homeric classics, and his critique was scathing.   Later Greek philosophers, including the middle Platonists and the Stoics, were not so dismissive.  The Platonists, for example, believed that there must be a deeper and other meaning to the dalliances of the gods, and so they began a technique of interpretation called "allegorical exegesis" which sought these "other meanings" (the literal meaning of "allegory").  This way they could preserve the classical heritage and recognize its aesthetic beauty, but improve on its philosophical sophistication.
 
The Stoics were less inclined to allegory, because as rationalists they did not want to argue that these great poems represented mythical flights of fancy, still less that they could be interpreted as meaning something other than what the poets intended.  But their technique of recovering them was not altogether different from the Platonists, because they found ways for the texts to mean something other than what they mean literally.
 
Today, begin with the secondary reading from Tripolitis. Outline the various philosophical groups she mentions, and be able to identify their core religious views. When you turn to Lucian of Samosata's little piece, you'll be reading a second-century pagan author from Syria who is not so optimistic about the value of Greek epic and mythology. In this entertaining dialogue with Zeus, Lucian forces the father of the gods to admit to the inherent logical flaws of Greek metaphysics. Try to identify what Lucian's skeptical alter ego, Cyniscus, teaches Zeus.
 
 
Assigned Readings
Primary: Lucian of Samosata, "Zeus Catechized" (ERes)
Secondary: Tripolitis, 36-46; online class prep
Optional: Homer, Iliad, Book 21 (ERes)
 
 
Further Reading
Attridge, Harold W.  "The Philosophical Critique of Religion under the Early Empire."  Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt II.16.1 (1978) 45-78.
 
Auerbach, Erich.  Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, trans. Willard R. Trask.  Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1953.
 
Dawson, David.  Allegorical Readers and Cultural Revision in Ancient Alexandria.   Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.
 
Dillon, John M.  The Middle Platonists: 80 B.C. to A.D. 220.  Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1977.
 
Dodds, E. R.  The Greeks and the Irrational.  Berkeley: University of California Press, 1951.
 
Graeser, Andreas.  "The Stoic Theory of Meaning."  In The Stoics (ed. John M. Rist; Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978) 77-100.
 
Lamberton, Robert.  Homer the Theologian: Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition, The Transformation of the Classical Heritage 9.  Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.
 
Tate, J.  "The Beginnings of Greek Allegory."  Classical Review 41 (1927): 214-15.
 
--------.  "Plato and Allegorical Interpretation."  Classical Quarterly 23 (1929) 142-54; Classical Quarterly 24 (1930) 1-10.
 
--------.  "On the History of Allegorism."  Classical Quarterly 28 (1934) 105-114.
 
van der Valk, M.  Researches on the Text and Scholia of the Iliad, 2 vols.   Leiden: Brill, 1963-1964.
 
Veyne, Paul.  Did the Greeks Believe in Their Myths?, trans. Paula Wissing.  Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
 
Whitman, Jon.  Allegory: The Dynamics of an Ancient and Medieval Technique.  Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1987.
 
 
Links
  • For further background on allegorical interpretation of Greek mythology, see the excellent page by Joseph Farrell, a Professor in the Department of Classical Studies at the University of Pennsylvania.
 
 
Sources
Photograph: John Decopoulos, "Aphrodite, Pan and Eros, National Archaeological Museum, Athens, Greece," National Archaeological Museum slide #5, FotoOlympic.
Get Adobe Acrobat