Santa Clara University
Religious Studies Department, SCU
Class Prep
Course Links
Syllabus
Class Prep
Camino
Assignments
Style Sheet
Bible
Library Reserve
Bibliography
Glossary
Extra Credit
Grades
Research Link
"Ain't Misbehavin'": A Jewish Philosopher Defends his God
 
Moses at the Burning Bush, Fresco from Dura Europos Our next apologist for the gods is Philo of Alexandria, an Egyptian Jew who lived around the time of Jesus (20 BCE-50 CE).  Philo was a leading Jew in the city, well-educated in the Greek philosophical systems of his day such as middle Platonism and Stoicism.  The Jewish middle Platonists in Alexandria did not have quite the same view of their most authoritative text, the Torah, as the Stoics did of Homer and Hesiod.  They believed as their Greek colleagues did that the Torah texts had multiple layers of meaning, but they did not share the belief that their Torah had subsequently become corrupted.  In this sense, it was superior to the Greek myths of Hesiod and the Homeric epics.  In addition, Jewish exegetes like Philo believed that the Torah had been written by Moses c.1240 BCE, long before Hesiod (late 700s BCE) Homer (700s-600s BCE), or Plato (c.428-347 BCE).  Thus, the Jewish tradition could be presented as antecedent to and purer than--and even the source of--the greatest philosophy of the Greek tradition.
 
But the Jewish scriptures had the same "problem" that Homer's classic did, namely that despite their sacred status and allegedly divine origin, they sometimes portrayed God in a manner that any educated Greek or Jew would find incomprehensible.   Just think about some of the texts we've read: In the second creation story, God is portrayed as if human, breathing life into the earth creature, walking in the garden at the breezy time of day, unaware how the humans came to discover their nakedness.  And all those duplicated stories that we attributed to the various authors of Torah were seen in antiquity as confusing repetitions and contradictions that had to be found coherent if they really came from a divine author.
 
As you read the passages from Philo, consider the following questions:
 
  1. Based on your readings about Platonism and Philo in Tripolitis, what Platonic emphases do you find in Philo's interpretation of the Genesis story? Make a list of phrases, or mark a print-out of the texts for easy reference in class.

  2. What a priori assumptions does Philo seem to be making about the nature of God? In other words, what does he assume about divine nature? What is his view of the Yahwist's anthropomorphic God?

  3. How does Philo interpret the second creation story's account of the helpers created for man? What do they represent?
 
In class, we will practice identifying and explaining Philo's allegorical interpretations of the Genesis passages.  For further practice, see the reading exercise on Allegorical Interpretation in Philo's Works.
 
 
Assigned Readings
Primary: Philo, Excerpts from various works
Secondary: Tripolitis, pp. 77-84; online class prep
Optional: Tripolitis, pp. 61-77, 84-90; Renfro, "On the Difference between the Interpretations by Plato and Philo of Ungodlike Actions of the Gods" (student research paper)
 
 
Further Reading
Attridge, Harold W.  "The Philosophical Critique of Religion under the Early Empire."  Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt II.16.1 (1978) 45-78.
 
Auerbach, Erich.  Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, trans. Willard R. Trask.  Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1953.
 
Daube, David.  "Alexandrian Methods of Interpretation and the Rabbis."  In Essays in Greco-Roman and Related Talmudic Literature (ed. Harry M. Orlinsky; The Library of Biblical Studies; New York: KTAV, 1977) 165-82.
 
Dawson, David.  Allegorical Readers and Cultural Revision in Ancient Alexandria.   Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.
 
Dillon, John M.  The Middle Platonists: 80 B.C. to A.D. 220.  Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1977.
 
Mack, Burton L.  "Philo Judaeus and Exegetical Traditions in Alexandria."  Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt II.21.2 (1984) 227-71.
 
Schneidau, Herbert N.  Sacred Discontent: The Bible and Western Tradition.   Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976.
 
Tobin, Thomas H.  The Creation of Man: Philo and the History of Interpretation.  Washington, D.C.: The Catholic Biblical Association of America, 1983.
 
Whitman, Jon.  Allegory: The Dynamics of an Ancient and Medieval Technique.  Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1987.
 
 
Links
 
 
Sources
Photograph: A. R. Bellinger, F. E. Brown, A. Perkins and C. B. Welles, eds., The Excavations at Dura-Europos Conducted by Yale University and the French Academy of Inscriptions and Letters, Final Report VIII, Part 1 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1956) Plate LXXVI.
Get Adobe Acrobat